She argues that students would be in danger in case of an emergency because of an insufficient number of gates. Does she really think that the schools with this configuration (such as Mariners) would allow their students to be in danger in case of an emergency or that the school board would approve a plan that would put anyone in danger?
She argues that a fence along the blacktop would create a sense of isolation. This seems in direct contrast to the original request for a fenced school. Which option does she want?
Parents, students, school staff and neighbors had an opportunity to provide input last year — and they did. Emotional arguments presented at the meeting Feb. 13 are not new, and no new information was discussed.
As a neighbor who participated in the process and feels that this option represents an excellent compromise for all parties involved (with student safety still the highest priority), I am frustrated by the level of emotional obfuscation now underway.
I hope that the NMUSD Board of Trustees and Supt. Fred Navarro do not go with a perimeter fence.
Water taxis warrant a 'fare' look
Re. "From the Boathouse: Harbor sorely lacking water taxis," (Feb. 14): My wife and I read Mike Whitehead's column, and we agree there is a huge need for water taxis.
Just last night we were on our Duffy, and my wife and I kept asking each other how people get from the shore to their boats or from their boats to a restaurant. Whitehead's example of Avalon's use of water taxis would make a great model.
I'm also remember the Chamber of Commerce, and I think it would do business a service to have a water taxi.
Does culture allow rushing?