Advertisement

Charter Committee fine-tunes language

It votes to leave out wording that would clarify permissible contact between council and city staff.

October 24, 2013|By Bradley Zint

As of now, Costa Mesa's proposed city charter does not have language clarifying how the City Council can personally interact with city staffers over administrative affairs.

The decision to leave it out came after a 5-4 vote Wednesday night by the Charter Committee, with five members — Mary Ann O'Connell, Hank Panian, Tom Pollitt, Lee Ramos and Harold Weitzberg — opining that the city's existing municipal code about such matters is sufficient.

The municipal code dictates that council members must deal with the city's administrative services only through the city CEO, "except for the purpose of inquiry." That section of the code, officially titled "Interference by council in administrative affairs" and last revised in 2002, also states that the council shall not give orders to the city CEO's subordinates, according to committee documents.

Advertisement

Committee members Kevin Tobin, Tom Graham, Bill Fancher and Gene Hutchins dissented, instead favoring adding language on the topic to the charter. Such language, they contended, would enhance the "firewall" between the council and staff.

Weitzberg questioned the need.

"What's broken here that we're fixing in this?" he said. "My concern is putting something in the charter that presently exists."

O'Connell spoke of the need for consequences should council members interfere too much in day-to-day city affairs.

"If you don't know what your risk is, you're going to take the risk every time," she said.

Group moderator Kirk Bauermeister, who is not a voting member, advised that the group may want to reconsider its decision when more members of the committee are present. Ron Amburgey, Brett Eckles, Kerry McCarthy and Andrew Smith were absent.

"My struggle with this is there are four people not here," he said.

*

Council compensation

The committee also debated the compensation of council members, who receive $904.40 a month and can opt in for a benefits package that includes healthcare and life insurance.

They also receive a pension through the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) or may enroll in the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS).

The group agreed on the council's salaries for what's considered a part-time job. Several members, however, said they felt uneasy with the council receiving a pension — which is vested after five years — and health benefits.

Daily Pilot Articles Daily Pilot Articles
|
|
|