Advertisement

Smith: Scouts use gay issue to divert attention

February 07, 2013|By Steve Smith

Being a Boy Scout used to be a simple: Sign up, pay dues, earn merit badges and move up the chain to Eagle Scout.

Today, it's tough to be a Boy Scout because the national council that creates policies decided many years ago to exclude gays.

The national council is in the middle of a major hand-wringing because its members can't decide whether to allow local Scout chapters to allow gay members, create a national policy allowing gay members, or just leave the ban in place.

Advertisement

According to Feb. 7 Daily Pilot article, "Scouts await ruling," "the [national council] said it needed more time to study the issue of sexual orientation."

That's hard to believe, considering that the issue of sexual orientation has been studied about as much as marijuana has been tested for its effects on the human brain.

The issues have some common ground in that they reflect the increasing inability of our society to put a stake in the ground and make a decision. We see the problem locally, for example, when the city of Costa Mesa created the Homeless Task Force a couple of years ago, despite the fact that it had studied the issue a few years before. The new task force's conclusion was that, yep, there are still homeless in the city and we need to do something about them. (Disclosure: I served on the more recent task force)

In Washington, D.C., they're still debating abortion, gun control, taxes and many other decades-old issues. Why? Because we keep electing the same type of person — those more interested in poll numbers and fundraising than getting work done.

Making firm decisions and making progress is not in the best interest of decision-makers because that puts them out of a job. As long as they kick problems down the street, they'll eventually turn the corner to review them again in a few years. At that time, they can create another committee or task force and study the issue again. It's the best form of job security. All you have to do is nothing.

I'm guessing that the Boy Scout leadership doesn't need to study the issue of sexual orientation; they need to study the financial and legal implications of the correct decision to allow gay members.

Financially, there could be a mass exodus from the Scouts by parents of heterosexual kids who believe that the presence of a gay member or two in a local chapter is going to make their child gay. That's absurd, of course, but that belief is common.

Daily Pilot Articles Daily Pilot Articles
|
|
|