Emails suggest suspended city clerk knew of deadline

Correspondence between registrar and Julie Folcik could cast doubt on her claim in court that she merely mixed up the March 9 due date.

March 30, 2012|By Joseph Serna

Costa Mesa City Clerk Julie Folcik was repeatedly reminded by election officials of the deadline to get a proposed city charter initiative on the June ballot, emails show.

The exchanges, obtained by the Daily Pilot through a California Public Records Act request, could cast doubt on the claim that Folcik was merely mixed up about the 5 p.m. March 9 deadline — an argument she made in a failed attempt last week to put the initiative on June's ballot even though she missed the deadline.

Employees with the Orange County Registrar of Voters told Folcik, who was suspended Wednesday, about the deadline in emails dated Nov. 9, Dec. 5 and March 8.


"Be sure to get the [resolution] to us by Friday to put the measure on the ballot," Kay Cotton, manager for voter services, wrote in an email to Folcik on March 8 — the morning before the deadline. "That can't wait until Monday by statute."

Folcik replied to Cotton's email the day of the deadline, essentially thanking Cotton for the information.

But when the registrar's office closed that evening, Costa Mesa hadn't submitted anything.

However, in an email dated Feb. 27, she wrote: "I will have the documents to you by March 9, 2012 … I know it's cutting it close. Sorry about that."

On March 10, Registrar Neal Kelley emailed Folcik asking her to call him. Folcik emailed everything over that Saturday afternoon and submitted copies in person the next business day, Monday, March 12. But by then it was too late.

In an email to the Daily Pilot on March 8, Folcik attached a calendar of deadlines for the June primary that includes the March 9 date for submitting city resolutions to be put on June's ballot.

In the days after the paperwork mistake, city CEO Tom Hatch called Folcik's error a "significant professional failure" and then suspended her, pending an investigation.

Citing the confidentiality of personnel matters, Hatch declined to comment further Friday.

Many of Folcik's supporters are standing by her.

"I feel like I don't have the ability to judge Julie on this," said Robin Leffler, a Costa Mesa resident and council observer. "On the other hand, [in] something of such great importance to the city, why weren't other people there to make sure everything was done right?"

Daily Pilot Articles Daily Pilot Articles