Deputy District Attorney Dan Wagner said that on Feb. 8, 2010, the defendants orchestrated a protest that interrupted Oren's speech every few seconds with the shouting of scripted lines and calling him a war criminal.
"They didn't want to have an exchange of ideas to see who was telling the truth and who was not," Wagner said. "What their intention was, make no mistake, was to shut him [Oren] down."
Wagner presented jurors with a "batting order" of what prosecutors claim was the planned conspiracy for the protestors to end Oren's speech.
"Usually people in society know what is and isn't expected … and it happens in this case there were pretty explicit rules given before the talk," Wagner said, adding that students were informed that, "'Yes, we expect civil debate on campus and we relish that. … But we will expect nothing less than civility and courtesy that is becoming this situation.'"
The first of the six defense attorneys, Daniel Mayfield, addressed jurors with a word written in green: "time."
He told jurors about the time Oren took to visit the university, and the time the defendants had to plan their protest within the limits of the law. He told jurors that the speech was 30 minutes late, independent of the student protest, and lasted a minute.
Defense attorney Reem Salahi then recited to the jury what the students said, including, "Michael Oren, propagating murder is not free speech," before she painted a picture of students whose concern was human rights.
"The question before you is whether these students committed crimes when they discussed logistics and how to protest Ambassador Oren," she told the jurors, adding the students did it "peacefully albeit rudely before walking out."
Two other defense attorneys said they would wait to make their opening statements.