1) A cover letter explaining that our home was showing some deteriorating paint and was in violation of a section of the city's municipal code;
2) A brochure explaining the city's code enforcement policy;
3) A copy of the citation;
4) Two photographs of the parts of our house showing the deteriorated paint;
5) A return envelope, the purpose of which was not identified in the letter or anywhere else.
Before continuing, please note: First, I was clearly in violation of the code and my son and I happily repaired the two areas in question and filed the necessary paperwork to avoid paying a $150 fine.
Second, I support the code enforcement program. Many years ago, I lived not too far from a man whose front yard looked more like a junkyard, and I realized back then the need for the city to be vigilant.
Third, my contact at the code enforcement department was courteous and helpful.
The package I received is an example of why Costa Mesa should be run more like a business, of how unchecked processes can exist in government for years without someone, somewhere, saying, "Is there a better way to do this?"
In the case of my citation, yes, there is clearly a better way.
The citation was generated by a code enforcement officer driving through our neighborhood while on a call to investigate another violation.
So far, so good.
Next, the officer took out a camera and snapped at least two photos of our property and wrote up a citation.
Back at the city office, the photos were uploaded from the camera to a computer and printed. The cover letter was generated and assembled with the citation, brochure, photos and return envelope and inserted into a larger envelope that was run through the postage meter and put in the U.S. mail for delivery.
Some may recognize the inefficiency of this system. And some recognize that current technology could easily make this process far more efficient, thus reducing costs, and saving taxpayers' hard-earned money.