It was clear from the outset the council members were facing an unabashedly skeptical crowd, with some guests offering sarcastic retorts during their presentations.
"Before I was on council, it was so obvious to me what the problem was," Righeimer said of city employee pensions. "As we looked at what we had to do [on the council], we knew we had to go with outsourcing."
Righeimer's claim, that employee pensions are a fiscal deadweight for Costa Mesa that can only be lifted by outsourcing and other drastic cuts, has been the source of the most heated debates Costa Mesa has seen since immigration enforcement in 2006.
Raising the audience's ire, Righeimer and Mensinger supplied few numbers to back up their claims that outsourcing saves money. To this point, Costa Mesa hasn't received many bids on how much outside companies would cost to run some city services, so there's no way yet to calculate potential savings.
The two officials stuck to what they knew for certain: The city's pension costs are estimated to climb about $10 million to $25 million in the next few years, and for the last three years, Costa Mesa has drained $33 million from its cash reserves to balance budgets — money they would have rather seen spent on road repairs, parks and city maintenance and other issues.
"Where do we get money for new parks? Where do we get money to upkeep the parks?" Righeimer asked.
Muir and Berardino maintained that the council majority's plan is politically motivated and that the numbers floated so far don't point to a need for layoffs.
If anything, the city should go back to the bargaining table with the employee groups, Berardino said.
He did not defend the current benefits employees had, instead saying there was room for change.