Instead, a courtroom debate on whether FMW's deal with the state's Department of General Services was legal ultimately transpired.
A sale to FMW would net the state an estimated $224 million over 35 years and $20 million through an initial down payment, according to the proposed deal detailed in court documents.
Those opposed to the transaction who are trying to block it through an appeal to the court include: Jeff Teller, owner of the OC Marketplace, which operates the swap meets at the fairgrounds; a competing bidder, Advanced Real Estate Services; State Sen. Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana); and Assemblyman Jose Solorio (D-Anaheim).
These appellants argue that the state steered the public bidding process on the fairgrounds in FMW's favor.
Wylie Aitken, the attorney representing the appellants, said in court on Friday that DGS didn't follow state guidelines for open bidding when it put the fairgrounds on the auction block. He told the panel that the misstep occurred because California lawmakers were in a rush to plug the state's budget gap and offload expendable property.
"I understand the motivation, but it doesn't mean you can throw out the Constitution," Aitken said.
California Dep. Atty. Gen. Michael Dwitmer argued that the state's guidelines were mainly used as a compass, but they didn't need to be followed explicitly because state open bidding statutes apply only to property purchases, not sales.
Lawmakers essentially said, "Go for it and sell this property, let us know how it goes," Dwitmer argued.
He also said that because lawmakers gave the green light in 2009 to sell the fairgrounds, they didn't require reapproval for FMW's proposal.
The judges focused many of their questions on how the case ended up before them and how the price was determined, suggesting that if the bidding process had allowed for other bidders to protest the outcome formally, they wouldn't be in court.