In a 4-to-1 vote just before midnight Tuesday, with Councilwoman Wendy Leece dissenting and despite nearly unanimous opposition from the audience, the Costa Mesa City Council approved contracting out 18 city services by the fall.
"This has been coming on for a long time, and we're coming to a point that's rock bottom," Mayor Gary Monahan told the crowd of mostly city employees.
Monahan, like many of the council members, blamed years of missteps by city staff or the council itself for leaving the city in its current budgetary predicament.
"The world works on a calendar and a clock," Mayor Pro Tem Jim Righeimer said. "[On] July 1 we have a new budget. What's happened in previous councils was we'd wait until the 11th hour and push something through."
Tuesday's move is part of a dramatic restructuring of a city that faces potentially skyrocketing pension costs in the coming years.
Overwhelmingly criticized as too fast and too radical by residents and city employees Tuesday night, City Council members were considering outsourcing a broad array of city services to still-undetermined private companies.
"What we don't need is to outsource our own needs of local government to strangers who have no stake in our lives or property values," Costa Mesa resident Eleanor Egan said before the vote. "If you go forward with this, you should be ashamed."
Costa Mesa's own projections show that in the next few years, it will be expected to pay more into the state's public pension fund, CalPERS. It's a situation being replayed up and down the state: When the CalPERS pension fund was flush in the early 2000s, Costa Mesa did not have to pay much to the state to cover its employees' retirement costs. Now that CalPERS investments are hurting, cities have to cover the difference.