Now, a city is not like a business in many ways. We all know that.
Still, many of us share the feeling that the city government should be more business-like, not only to get our city out of the pool of red ink it's currently in, but also to make it a nicer place.
But what about this business analogy? Does it make any sense at all? Should we think of Costa Mesa almost as though it's a corporation that we see in the non-government sector?
Well, why not? Why not think a little along these lines and entertain a little fiction if it seems that it will make Costa Mesa a nicer place for those of us who live here?
We can, for example, think of Costa Mesa as a corporation that owns and manages a chain of retail stores. These are the assets of the corporation. In our case, the retail stores — the assets — are our neighborhoods.
We can think of the City Council as the board of directors of the corporation. City employees are corporate employees.
The citizens are the shareholders — each holding one share (their vote) in the corporation.
The citizens are also the customers of the corporation, and what they buy from Costa Mesa Inc. are services and a certain quality of life.
If the customers/shareholders don't get the quality of life they want from the corporation, they may sell their shares and go to another city that does provide them with what they want and become shareholders there.
Now, do we have some underperforming assets in our chain and are they dragging down our bottom line? If so, how do we improve them and get them to perform up to where they should perform?
A real corporation with a chain of retail stores might just close down the underperforming assets. Of course, Costa Mesa can't simply get out of a lease if we have an underperforming asset or two and open up for business down the road where things are better. No, we have to fix the asset or it will continue to damage our bottom line.