The way it landed on the charter ballot measure appears to show the influence of some Chamber of Commerce officials. Four current or past members of the chamber's board of directors, including three of its chairmen, sat on the seven-member Charter Update Commission.
Community activists have protested their connections, and have questioned if public dollars would ultimately be funneled to the chamber's political advocacy.
The funding limit caps at $2,400 the amount the City Council may give to the business group each year.
Commissioners say the limit unfairly restricts the chamber, and that they were transparent about their ties to the organization when they advised the city about charter reforms.
"This is not to give more money to the chamber," said Commissioner Rush Hill, who is running for City Council. "This is for the chamber to be treated like any other nonprofit in the community."
"Some people would like to make this a political issue," he added.
The City Council had appointed seven prominent citizens in December — including Hill and former state Sen. Marian Bergeson — to study a specific list of issues with the charter and to recommend changes for voters to decide.
The list covered a variety of issues, from redistricting guidelines to rules on oil drilling.
While charged with a defined scope, the commission also had the ability to request that the City Council add to its issues. At least two proposals other than the chamber's went before the commission, including one introduced by a community association, but they did not receive a motion for a vote.
At least one commissioner questioned the chamber proposal, but the chamber directors advocated for the idea, and the City Council ultimately voted to include it in Measure V, according to meeting minutes.
The chamber limit was the only law the commissioners asked the council add to the ballot measure.