Furthermore, those who help you continue your trespass, either through acts of commission or omission, and whether motivated by a misplaced compassion, or a profit motive, or something else, are aiding and abetting criminality.
They are also doing a disservice to law-abiding citizens and are helping desensitize the public to crime and the corrosive effect of your illegality on society, and they are at the same time coarsening and diminishing the quality of life of those who play by the rules.
Communities that allow this — sanctuary cities — quickly become crime filled holes-in-the wall that are soon abandoned by law abiding citizens. Then, the crime gets worse and more intense and the downward spiral of the community continues.
Soon, the local population includes a very large number of criminals. And then (forgive me, but a different metaphor now presents itself), it becomes a matter of the inmates running the asylum and voting out the guards.
Back in the old West, there were towns that lived on criminality. Many of the corrupt "upstanding citizens" of such towns supported leaving the local criminals alone. They just turned a blind eye to the criminality. It was good for business in some cases and the criminals were often dispersed throughout the community and were the neighbors living next door.
No doubt, the same arguments we're hearing now from some misguided people in Costa Mesa about how illegal aliens are our neighbors and our co-workers, and how we should all just get along; were made back in the old West about the criminals of that day.
Today, many sanctuary cities and those who support them really are the modern equivalents of those hole-in-the-wall towns and the so-called civic leaders of those towns.
We are a nation of laws, and those who break our laws in the first instance and those who help them in the second are both outlaws.