On Nov. 5, a rampage at Ft. Hood, Texas, left at least 13 people dead and many wounded. The alleged gunman was Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan. News reports raised the possibility that his reputedly zealous religious views may have been a factor, although the investigation into the incident has not officially borne that out.
Should the religious background of all members of the Armed Forces be carefully scrutinized and monitored while they’re in uniform and serving the United States? Or does their freedom of religious expression, which is protected under the Constitution, supersede national security and the need to prevent such an act from happening again?
This is a difficult question. I believe that background checks should certainly be made, but whether there needs to be “carefully monitored and scrutinized” attention to religious practice, I cannot necessarily say.