Advertisement

Fair board probed

Executive director of the First Amendment Coalition says private meeting about O.C. Fairgrounds may have violated state law.

October 22, 2009|By Mona Shadia

The Orange County Fair & Event Center’s Board of Directors might have violated one of California’s open-meeting laws when its six members, who were appointed by the governor, met privately two weeks ago to discuss a newly formed foundation whose mission is to raise money to buy the O.C. Fairgrounds from the state.

The board might have violated the Bagley-Kean Act, a provision in the California Constitution that requires members of a state board to notify the public about its meetings, according to Peter Scheer, an expert on the state’s open-meeting laws.

“I believe all government process should be open and transparent,” said Jeff Teller, president of the Orange County Market Place, whose members include more than 1,000 vendors who do business at the 150-acre fairgrounds in Costa Mesa. “At this point, the people that serve on the fair board are serving the governor of California and the people of California. If they are in violation of the law, that seems to be problematic to me.”

Advertisement

David Ellis, the board’s vice chairman, said the six members met two weeks ago to discuss the Orange County Fair and Event Center Foundation’s bylaws and codes of conduct. The foundation was officially created Oct. 7.

When asked why the meeting was conducted privately and out of public view, Ellis and board Chairwoman Kristina Dodge said the trustees did not discuss fair and event center matters. Both said they do not believe the get-together violated any open-meeting laws.

“What if I invited them to dinner at my house? That wouldn’t be a violation,” Dodge said.

Although the foundation is not subject to the Bagley-Kean Act because it’s a nonprofit, the fair’s board is, said Scheer, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition in San Rafael, Calif.

“Because the activities and the range of activities of these two institutions, one public and one private, are so similar and so overlapping, almost anything the foundation board might talk about is something that would fall within the jurisdiction of the government entity of the board,” he said. “Therefore, while you have to look at the specifics of what they are discussing, there’s a high probability that every time they get together, ostensibly as the board of the foundation, they are actually meeting illegally as the board of the government entity, whether they think they are or not.”

Daily Pilot Articles
|
|
|