Advertisement

Tapings OK for UCI talks

Policy changes to allow recording of student groups’ events. Some say that previous speakers have spewed hate speech.

October 19, 2007|By Joseph Serna

UC Irvine’s policy to let student organizations decide whether they will allow the recording of meetings and speakers on campus will change, UCI officials said Thursday. Instead, the university will support the right to record speakers and meetings held on campus.

The issue has surfaced in recent years as the campus has struggled with complaints about controversial speakers. It came to a head in May when Newport Beach Assemblyman Chuck DeVore brought a video camera to record a speaker sponsored by the Muslim Student Union. The organization had posted signs requesting no videotaping, but the group did not try to stop DeVore from using his video camera.

It shouldn’t have been an issue since student organizations and the university may not regulate free speech when activities are held on a public campus, Terry Francke, the general counsel for the nonprofit free-speech advocacy group Californians Aware, said in May.

Advertisement

“I’m cautiously optimistic that at least a change in policy regarding recording events will at least turn down the temperature at UCI by letting people know who intend to participate in incendiary hate speech they will be held accountable,” DeVore said.

“We all along here have been dedicated to the idea that students should have freedom of expression,” university spokeswoman Cathy Lawhon said. “We abhor anything that might appear as hate speech or anti-Semitism. But we stand by people’s rights to say it because as a campus we have to stand for a free exchange of ideas.”

Jesse Rosenblum, chairman of an independent task force investigating anti-Semitism at UCI, said he was most concerned about the hate speech that might take place in private meetings student organizations have on campus.

The Hillel Foundation assembled the task force, but dropped the investigation; the task force, however, decided to continue the review on its own.

Critical and radical views are acceptable in a public forum, Rosenblum said. But a university-sanctioned meeting on campus property where recordings are prohibited and opposing views are shut down is detrimental to a university’s mission, he said. The private hate speech on campus is one of the task force’s main focuses, he added.

Daily Pilot Articles
|
|
|