The University of Michigan recently approved installation of two footbaths in a pair of unisex bathrooms so Muslim students could wash their feet before prayers, as required by their faith. Part of the motivation was to improve safety, and university officials point out they were paid for by student fees, not taxpayer money. Do you think it's appropriate for a public institution to provide amenities such as footbaths when it's done to improve safety or does it run afoul of the separation of church and state principle?
When anything is done to improve safety or to provide a needed service to the public, then I am in favor of using public or private funds to cover the cost, whether it is to accommodate the disabled, pregnant women, drug recovery centers or religious needs.
The issue here is that there is a serious health concern in washing the feet in the public hand basin and a potential dangerous problem for a slip-and-fall injury. In addition, the enrollment of Muslim students is high and growing, thus making it an even greater risk. Therefore, the resolution proposed by the university is proper.