"Ninety-five percent of our buildings are already built and most of them are not built to efficient standards, so I think there is a lot more gain to be made in that area," he said. "I'm into using incentives. I'm not into mandating."
Bever is still gathering information, so it's not clear exactly what his plan will look like. But it could include waiving city permit fees for people who make their homes more efficient and working with utility companies to encourage water-saving irrigation, solar panels and the like.
Foley's initial suggestions include speeding up the building permit process and waiving fees to get residential and commercial developments to use solar power or have buildings certified as "green."
She also proposed having the city set an example by shifting its fleet to alternative-fuel vehicles, requiring new city facilities to meet green building standards, and turning unused areas on streets into green spaces.
Along with Councilwoman Linda Dixon, Foley proposed the committee in 2006, and she disputed Bever's contention that it was about mandates.
Foley and Bever have often been at odds, but she said she hopes they can work together on an environmental building incentive plan.
One area where they already disagree is new construction. Bever's plan won't include provisions for new buildings because, he said, "I think the housing market already demands those type of approaches. From what I've seen, most developers are using sustainable technology and high-efficiency developments in their homes."
Dixon said she's pleased to see her colleagues taking the idea seriously, after they dismissed it last year, but she's not sure what spurred the change of heart.