Advertisement

Gay marriage as a domino

April 03, 2004

It will not end with legalizing polygamy either. Anyone who is

reading the news knows that other issues like pedophilia (sex with

children), incest and others are also being challenged. Open the door

and where will it stop? It won't.

I have moral objections to all of these issues in a society that

is increasingly coming to the conclusion that the only absolute is

that there are no absolutes. From a business or government

Advertisement

perspective, imagine the costs and paperwork headaches in the HR

departments to add and subtract and change the status of multiple

partners.

Anything that becomes universal loses its identity. Marriage is

losing its identity and is coming to mean nothing in our culture.

P.S. To those who say marriage/sex is about reproduction, stop --

that's bad theology and a terrible argument. God created sex for

enjoyment too -- within a heterosexual marriage.

ASSOCIATE PASTOR RIC OLSEN

Harbor Trinity Church

Costa Mesa

Having come of age in the 1960s, I recall how the domino theory

dominated strategic thinking: the idea that if the Communist regime

of North Vietnam succeeded in overthrowing the dictatorship of South

Vietnam, the North Vietnamese would proceed to foment Communist

revolution throughout Indochina and conquer the region.

In retrospect, Robert McNamara, one of the chief architects of

that policy, explained that the domino theory had no factual

foundation. The reality was that no North Vietnamese leader ever

expressed the least interest in such a scheme. North Vietnamese

leaders were amazed to learn that Americans actually believed

anything so preposterous.

I am, then, skeptical of domino theories. As the slippery slope of

the war in Vietnam was proven to be fictitious, I view as equally

ludicrous the proposition that legitimizing homosexual unions as

"marriages" could have a domino effect leading to acceptance of

polygamy. The issue of same-sex unions being defined as marriage

ought to be considered on its own merits, and not compromised by

hysteria over what societal value might fall next. While I believe

there are good reasons to affirm marriage solely as a heterosexual

relationship, I do not see homosexual "marriages" as undermining the

value of monogamy and leading to polygamy.

I cannot imagine how one can clearly demonstrate how monogamous

"marriage" between homosexuals could plausibly lead to endorsing

polygamy, or incest, a Manson family wedding or any other Chicken

Little scenarios.

Advocates of recognizing homosexual unions as marriage say they

Daily Pilot Articles
|
|
|