that can be sought out; it's something that is earned. I did also
want to comment that there was a misquote about Libby Cowan's
involvement.
The organizers -- all of us -- wanted her and many other
politicians and women in the community that have a lot of experience
to be involved with this as a women's event and offer us their
expertise. We were not choosing specifically based on sexual
orientation. So I do think that is a misquote.
Also I wanted to respond to the tone of the column. I think that
it's a wonderful thing that parents in Costa Mesa apparently are
teaching their children about diversity and discrimination and
respect and issues like this. As a social worker/student in the
master's program, I feel very strongly about those issues, however
the column seems to group all of the marchers into one generalization
about demanding respect.
I think that there's just too much of a generalization made about
the individuals marching; as any other marginalized group, lesbians
are very diverse. Some were carrying signs that said "dikes are
nice," "lesbians have feelings too," things to that effect, so I feel
that it was unfortunate that the tone generalized a marginalized
group when Smith seemed to want to promote education about
discrimination, and the first thing about discrimination is when you
start to categorize and label people.
I just found that contradictory and unfortunate because there were
some very, very interesting points in the column.
NICKI TOBIAS
Orange