Advertisement

Last round of the debate over creationism in

READERS RESPOND --

January 18, 2001

public schools

Who's that lurking by the back door of the schoolhouse? It's Wendy Leece!

She's put white lab coats on the religious icons from her church and is

trying to sneak them into school disguised as science teachers

(figuratively speaking, of course).

Leece, in her letter ("Educators should be able to challenge evolutionary

theory," Jan. 11), fails to respond to any of the points I made in my

Advertisement

prior letter ("Creationism should not be taught as a science," Jan. 9).

Instead of a reasoned response to my defense of teaching about evolution

in our public schools, Leece has fired off a barrage of unsupported

assertions and incoherent word strings. "Fossils, peppered moths, the

Cambrian explosion" . . . Boom! Take that, Egan!

I started out to respond as though her letter were a rational discussion.

I first wrote an explanation of what the words she used mean and why the

matters she referred to don't lessen the validity of the theory of

evolution and, in the case of fossils, actually are a main support of the

theory. In my response, I also discussed the proper roles of science and

faith, and the confusion that results from attempting to make either one

do the work of the other. I refuted each of her assertions. However, it

took about 2,500 words, too long for a letter to the editor. Then I

realized there's no point in using reason to address ranting.

The question really is not whether our present understanding of the

natural history of today's species is complete. Rather, the question is

whether public school science courses should teach about nature or the

supernatural; should they teach about the scientific method or faith?

Any family who wants their child's school to teach religion is free to

send their child to a religious school. Otherwise, their child can attend

a public school to learn about the world we share with other people and

cultures. For religious instruction, their child can go to a church,

chapel, meeting house, temple, synagogue, mosque or ashram. A public

school is not a proper place to proselytize or indoctrinate children in

religion.

If we take Leece's advice and have our public schools teach religion

instead of science, and then turn our children out into the high-tech

world of the 21st century, God help them!

ELEANOR EGAN

Costa Mesa

I met Wendy Leece in the early 1980s when our children attended the same

elementary school. She impressed me as a woman of veracity, honor and

integrity, then and now.

I feel very comfortable with her viewpoints on education, i.e. teaching a

Daily Pilot Articles
|
|
|